This nerdy and ignorant comment is inspired by page 13 of Bennett’s “Deeper Man” regarding this notion that in the physical world, or the world of function, “we are dealing with how things behave, not with what they are.” I am trying to convince myself that this is, in fact, true.
Building block of life are elementary particles associated with either matter or force. OK, let's start with matter, how is it defined? Matter is usually defined in terms of mass and volume and something about radiation (matter emits or reflects radiation), that’s how matter can be directly observed. It’s not a good definition because there is “dark matter” which supposedly comprises 26% of the density matter in the universe (only 4% is ordinary matter, and the other 70% is “dark energy”) is not observed directly but it is detected indirectly. Can anyone define "matter" better? Or this proves that we cannot define anything in terms of essence?
Tags:
Share
Facebook
You need to be a member of Sacred Commons to add comments!
Join Sacred Commons